-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Fabric
-
Labels:
-
Story Points:3
See attachments for failed ping chart and onos-diags
From Saurav:
Basically this issue is only seen with the OVS switches, due to the use of the special PopVlanPuntGroup.
Because of a timing issue table10 flows which try to use this group before it is ready, never get installed.
2018-04-23 19:53:57,740 | DEBUG | tive-installer-2 | OvsOfdpa2Pipeline | 176 | Received filtering objective for dev/port: of:0000000000000004/3 2018-04-23 19:53:57,741 | INFO | tive-installer-2 | OvsOfdpa2Pipeline | 176 | popVlanPuntGroup not found in dev:of:0000000000000004
In the most recent logs for CASE103, switches of:4 and of:5 are missing flows in table 10 that receive traffic from the spines - ie receiving untagged packets and pushing vlan 4094
deviceId=of:0000000000000004, flowRuleCount=146
ADDED, bytes=206724, packets=2746, table=0, priority=0, selector=[], treatment=[transition=TABLE:10]
ADDED, bytes=1106, packets=9, table=10, priority=32768, selector=[IN_PORT:11, VLAN_VID:40], treatment=[transition=TABLE:20]
ADDED, bytes=0, packets=0, table=10, priority=32768, selector=[IN_PORT:7, VLAN_VID:40], treatment=[transition=TABLE:20]
ADDED, bytes=25860, packets=368, table=10, priority=32768, selector=[IN_PORT:12, VLAN_VID:170], treatment=[transition=TABLE:20]
ADDED, bytes=0, packets=0, table=10, priority=32768, selector=[IN_PORT:8, VLAN_VID:40], treatment=[transition=TABLE:20]
ADDED, bytes=29730, packets=411, table=10, priority=32768, selector=[IN_PORT:12, VLAN_VID:110], treatment=[transition=TABLE:20]
ADDED, bytes=1396, packets=10, table=10, priority=32768, selector=[IN_PORT:10, VLAN_VID:40], treatment=[transition=TABLE:20]
ADDED, bytes=148632, packets=1948, table=10, priority=0, selector=[], treatment=[transition=TABLE:60]
